It's illustrating the subject's suggested resemblance to the artist (hence the "self-portrait" part). There's more to it, of course. Rocket00010:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scope clear as in article. Image has name of scope and article. Would be interesting to have a right version of the same setup. --Foroa15:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support I tend to agree with Foroa, although I am wondering if the scope could be adjusted to something slightly more concise and self-explanatory like "Speculation about Mona Lisa being a self portrait". I think the image is quite convincing at illustrating that speculation. -- Slaunger22:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Scope changed from Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa and self-portait to Comparison of Leonardo da Vinci's Mona Lisa and his self-portait {{{3}}}
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
It's hard to say, but I think that getting a clear description of the speculation about the Mona Lisa and Leonardo di Vinci is the necessary first step. Adam Cuerden03:39, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png){kind=small}
